You’re Not Getting Older, You’re Just Getting Better at Tennis (Mostly)
Too Bad the USTA Doesn’t Seem to Agree 😟
Ah, the USTA rating system—our frenemy on the court. We’ve all started somewhere in our league journey, whether it was a pro handing us a number 25+ years ago or, in today’s world, filling out an online questionnaire and trusting the “almighty algorithm” to decide our fate. From there, the algorithm watches over us like a silent referee, ready to bump us up (or down) based on our performance.
I still remember the sweet, sweet victory of moving from a 3.0 to a 3.5 after six long years. Was I grinding on the court every day to make it happen? Not really. Back then, tennis was more of a social escape—hitting with the neighbors, laughing with friends, and maybe even treating the post-match snacks as the real highlight, because my wife won’t buy me cookies at the store. But then one day, something clicked. I realized I could actually improve. I took lessons, practiced harder, and finally made it. 3.5! WooHoo! I thought, “4.0 is just around the corner!”
Fast forward 13 years… still a 3.5. (Cue the dramatic music.) But let’s save that rant about other aspects of NTRP system for another day because, if you play league doubles, you know all too well that sometimes it’s less about your skill and more about the luck of the draw—or the misfortune of being paired with someone having an off day (and I’ve had my share of bad days, sorry partners). Trust me, I could fill an entire series of posts on how doubles dynamics can make or break your chances of moving up.
The Almighty Algorithm: It Giveth and It Taketh Away
Here’s the thing about the USTA rating system: it’s mysterious, unyielding, and holds your fate in its hands like a Shakespearean villain. You don’t get to know your dynamic rating—it’s locked away tighter than a Wimbledon trophy. Instead, once a year in December, the USTA delivers your rating update like a surprise package. For some, it’s an early Christmas gift. For others, it’s the coal-filled stocking that sticks with you for the next 12 months, no matter how much you improve—or how many matches you lose when life throws you a curveball.
And look, I get it. The annual update makes sense. If ratings were dynamic, players could get bumped off teams’ mid-season, and that kind of chaos isn’t exactly conducive to league play. But still, there are a couple of things about the system that make me want to smash my racquet like a frustrated pro after a botched overhead.
The Double Faults of the NTRP System
1. The "Easy Appeal" for Older Players (55+):
Let’s talk about this one. Once you hit 55, the USTA makes it almost laughably easy to appeal down a level. Now, I’m all for fairness—if someone’s abilities have declined, sure, they should be playing at a level that matches their skills. But let me paint you a picture: imagine someone wins the 3.5 Singles NTRP Nationals, racks up a bunch of tournament wins, dominates in leagues, gets bumped up to 4.0 in December… and then, with a few clicks of the mouse and no physical ailments to speak of, appeals back down to 3.5.
Fair play? I’ll let you decide. (Okay, I’m kind of deciding for you, but you get my point.) I’m not accusing anyone of intentionally gaming the system 😉, but it sure doesn’t feel like it aligns with the USTA’s goal of promoting fair competition.
2. The Struggle to Appeal Up at 65:
Now here’s the kicker. Once we hit the tender young age of 65, the algorithm doesn’t automatically bump us up—even if we’re playing our hearts out and improving every year. Instead, we have to ask to be bumped up. That’s right, we’re stuck in this weird limbo of having to essentially beg the system to reward our hard work.
Shouldn’t the algorithm handle this automatically? If I’m getting better with age (and I like to think I am), why not recognize that progress without making me jump through hoops? After all, isn’t the whole point of the rating system to reflect our actual level of play? I mean, if I’m working hard enough to compete at 4.0, let me in!
Now, for full transparency, I’m not quite at the 4.0 level yet—I’m probably a few tenths of a point away. But hey, I’m optimistic! Maybe by 70, I’ll finally get there.
What’s Your Take?
So, what’s your experience with the NTRP system? Whether it’s being bumped up, bumped down, or stuck in rating purgatory, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Let’s get this conversation started—leave a comment and get it off your chest! After all, we’re all in this crazy tennis journey together, and even if the USTA doesn’t always get it right, we can at least share a laugh (or cry) or two about it.
Love this post? Hit like ❤️ and help me serve it up to more tennis fans out there!